- Disaster Recovery- IT Systems and Disaster Preparedness
Chad M Lawler (Data Return, LLC, USA); Stephen A Szygenda (Southern Methodist University, USA)
This paper supports a broader research effort into Disaster Tolerant Computing and Communications. The data and findings demonstrate an existing general unreliability of tradition business Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity systems, technologies and initiatives. This document reviews the financial significance of IT systems and business process downtime and observes data that indicates a general lack of business priority and investment in DR and BCP in US businesses. This paper reviews the effects that disasters have on business investment in DR and BCP and provides an analysis of evidence indicating inadequate traditional DR and BCP practices.
This paper hypothesizes that traditional Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Planning are not sufficient to protect businesses and organizations from IT systems and network outages, nor do they enable IT applications and business processes to adequately continue operations throughout the occurrence of a disaster. In actuality, these practices leave organizations and businesses vulnerable to complete organizational failure in the event of a cascading, virtually simultaneous, multiple point of failure event. To address these challenges, a broad, encompassing approach for Disaster Tolerance, not recovery, leveraging systems engineering principles is required, involving strategy, people, processes, technology and testing to ensure IT systems and business continuance. Approaches for potential solution paths for these challenges are reviewed in the conclusions of this document.
- Effective Inter-organizational Knowledge Sharing in Public Disaster Management Response
Jose Rocha (Florida International University, USA); Irma Becerra-Fernandez (Florida International University, USA)
Disasters are characterized by a series of dynamic and constant changing events with attributes related to time, geographic place, size, periodicity, circumstances, magnitude, information, knowledge, and people (Kumar, 2000) which heavily influence decision-making processes during disasters. Once the disaster occurs, these attributes place additional demands on the teams involved in the disaster recovery efforts, for example dynamic and evolving conditions, role uncertainty, and the need situational response increases the complexity of decision-making. Furthermore, these attributes may increasingly impair the management capabilities of the EOC participants, which include delegation, communication, decision-making, and inter-agency co-ordination (Paton and Jackson, 2002). In fact, research shows the lack of effective cooperation and coordinated actions through collaboration and information sharing are still critical and open problems all across the disaster management board (Jenkins 2006; Smith and Dowell, 2000). The unstable and changing environmental conditions surrounding in a disaster where almost everything is an exception to the norm, call for an effective and efficient cooperation, collaboration, and coordinated actions through information and knowledge sharing (Kapucu, 2006; Turoff, 2002). Further, a skillful design and use of information communication technologies (ICT) to support knowledge transfer, lessons learned from previous disaster events, and just-in-time training in the what's, when's, why's, and how's of disaster management is critical (Choi and Browner, 2006; Confort et al., 2004; Paton and Jackson, 2002).
The motivation behind this study is driven by the need to better understand knowledge sharing processes and activities in the relatively unexplored context of disaster management. This study is based on a review of relevant theoretical and empirical studies of effective knowledge-sharing in disaster management, from the perspective of knowledge management, social networks, and communities of practice.
- Project ENSAYO: A Virtual Emergency Operations Center
Irma Becerra-Fernandez (Florida International University, USA); Michael Prietula (Emory University, USA); Gregory Madey (University of Notre Dame, USA); Domingo A. Rodriguez (University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, Puerto Rico); Arvind Gudi (Florida International University, USA); Jose Rocha (Florida International University, USA)
Disaster management, the focus of Project Ensayo, is becoming an increasingly important topic of research as evidenced by recent events such as hurricanes Katrina and Rita, tsunami, earthquakes, forest fires, floods and severe winter storms, and by civil disturbances, infrastructure failures (power failures, aircraft disasters, industrial accidents) and terrorism events. Disaster management, before, during, and after the event, is dynamic, complex, and ill-defined. Decision-making is often distributed, ad hoc, and made by individuals and institutions that do not normally interact. This paper describes the research activities of Project Ensayo, which seeks to support and enable multiple research projects investigating processes, functions and structures present at Emergency Operations Centers, including situational awareness, knowledge management, inferences from dynamic data, disaster management and mechanisms of command, control, communication and coordination. The researchers will design, develop, deploy and operate a virtual Emergency Operations Center (vEOC) that will enable and support research on dynamic decision-making, decision support and knowledge management in the context of predefined organizational structures to coordinate cross-institutional management of disasters. Ensayo is designed to work flexibly in any combination or mix in two operational dimensions: (1) real vs. virtual actors, and (2) same place vs. different place. The Project Ensayo vEOC design uses the REED architecture and will be implemented using service oriented architecture (SOA) standards, tools and middleware. A virtual EOC will be developed based on an in-depth analysis of one of the most advanced EOCs (Miami-Dade). This infrastructure for computational discovery will enable multiple research projects focused on understanding and improving the practice of disaster management and the complex set of issues enabling the requirements for community continuity. Project Ensayo, the vEOC, will serve the following research objectives: (1) a research-enabling environment and infrastructure - to enable the research of knowledge management and collaboration issues in complex environments, such as those arising when managing disasters; (2) a test-bed for policies, processes, best practices and disaster management technologies-aimed at improving both the effectiveness and efficiency in the management of disasters; and (3) an education and training facility for students, managers, and EOC staff across the world - by providing a pedagogical infrastructure for students on-site (same place) or off-site (different place), collaborating with other physical entities (real actors) or artificial agents (virtual actors).
- Training Disaster Simulators – A Technology that Needs Management
Yasser A. Hosni (University of Central Florida, USA); Anthony Saka (Morgan University, USA); Jack Selter (University of Central Florida, USA); Nabeel Yousef (University of Central Florida, USA)
Simulation in general and training simulators in particular have advanced a great deal over the last several years. Due to high quality animation, fast responding hardware, and cleaver software; the simulators “industry” is flourishing. From simulating the product/ system performance to the use of simulation for games and training, the applications are spreading fast.
One of the most promising areas in the simulation use is in the training of the first responders in disastrous events. Be it due to nature, such as hurricanes, or man-made such as accidents or terror events, disaster(s) simulators are ideal tools to train first responders, short of a physical training.
In this paper we report on the development and evaluation of Virtual Reality-based simulation to train first responders for the command and control in disaster situations.
The simulation scenarios include specifically designed events replicating the situation to be controlled. For maximum “reality”, virtual reality (VR) is used in conjunction with a 3D identical replica of the physical system where the disaster occurs. The trainees use the actual communication system on site to direct rescue teams.
Through actual training sessions for first responders in two disastrous events (a crash of an aircraft in an international airport, and a chemical explosion in a US port), an evaluation study was conducted to assess the training effectiveness and to compare between Desktop-based training and Semi virtual reality (VR) based training.
In addition to reporting on the VR system technology, the paper reports on the evaluation criteria used in assessing the effectiveness of the training simulated scenarios. Scenario design and its matching to the trainee responsibilities, realism, and System fidelity were found to be the most influential factors in assessing the training value.
The study shows that VR is far more superior than desktop. VR exceeded by far in all aspect of training. This was evident by the discussion between the participants in the “After action review” sessions, in addition to the participant’s perception of the training sessions.
The study also uncovers a hidden “threat” to the use of VR simulation. While it may be efficient as a training tool for security personnel, it can be also a training device for counter measures that can be used by terror groups. Such, suggests protecting such technology, and take the necessary actions to prevent the technology from being used by the wrong people.
The paper details the findings of the study and recommend ways to manage the VR-based training technology in security related issues.